Obama’s speaking style

If presidents of the United States were decided on speaking style alone, Barack Obama wouldn’t just be moving into the White House tomorrow, he’d be there for a long time. His speaking style is perfect, and it’s been demonstrated. You see, Obama is one of those rare people who comes along and has that rare gift to be able to blow your socks off with just words. You’ll see that quite a few U.S. presidents through history are described that was (Lincoln, Roosevelt, Kennedy), which is precisely why they were voted in – because they had the ‘good gift of the gab’.

I say ‘good’ because, as we all know, there are two ways that someone can be verbally gifted. There’s the person who can sell ice to eskimos – the man who can get you to believe anything by the way they speak. The way this is used is bad. A couple of good examples of this are Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Great speakers, bad motives. Then there are the Obama’s in the word who have the ‘gift’ but use it to inspire, to change, and to lead everyone to a better place.

Unfortunately (as evidenced by current President Bush) speaking isn’t what gets you voted in all the time. But Barack Obama has forged his path to his party’s nomination through his impressive rhetoric and speaking style. A look at any number of speeches that he made pre-primary race voting showed that he was clearly a gifted speak. His 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote address was the single thing that not only propelled him into party spotlight, but put his name in the minds of voters to get him to run in the 2008 primaries. If he had delivered a mediocre speech, or hadn’t been as impressive as he was, then you wouldn’t see him in the race now. In 4 or 8 more years, yes you would. But in a short 4 years, by the delivery of one speech, he was able to get in on the act and become the Democratic nominee.

Don’t forget, either, that the D.N.C. that Obama spoke at was Senator John Kerry’s – who went on to lose the election, and had accusations leveled at him that he stood for nothing. You could be forgiven for thinking that anyone associated with that convention and Kerry’s nomination is now tainted – in fact, it’s true for everyone except Obama. Kerry isn’t a ‘big name’ in the Democratic party anymore, John Edwards bombed out in the 2008 primaries, Jim Jordan was Kerry’s campaign adviser through the primaries, and now can hardly get a serious candidate to work for. But Obama, who came out strong for Kerry, and became the face of the ’04 D.N.C. remain unscathed.

Why is Obama such a successful speaker though? One reason is that he isn’t talking on lines of depression, depth, and despair – Obama speaks about hope. It’s no coincidence that Obama has always spoken in such a style that his campaign slogans says “Hope is on the way”. Obama speaks and gives his listener hope. He’s uplifting, he inspires, he motivates. Like J.F.K., and like Martin Luther King Jr. and Ronald Reagan, he is always talking to rally people. Take a look at his ‘concession’ speech after New Hampshire. Obama was meant to win, and win big. He didn’t, and he lost to Clinton. But his speeches afterwards made him sound like the winner. If you had just watched him, you could be convinced that he was playing a joke and he romped the state home.

In a time of fear, which is what the United States is in now, the person who will become leader is the one who can speak to reassure, to calm, and to speak about the positives. The leader will be someone who gives hope to the masses. Obama gives hope on civil issues – look at his ‘A more perfect union’ speech. He gives hope to the political process – why polling consistently rates him the most trusted candidate. He even gives hope to people for himself – why he has tended to dominate national polling against both Clinton and John McCain.

It’s not just delivery with Obama either – it’s presentation. When he speaks, he looks like he believes what he is saying, so why shouldn’t you? And that’s because he does believe in what he is speaking about. Watch, and you’ll see that he brings in civil rights, ‘honest politics’, hope, and change into all of his speeches. You look at him, you can associate those things to him. He looks like he believes in all of this, and he does. He stands tall (and tall he is), he doesn’t squirm or move around. He is still and calm when being attacked, as if he is listening so as to take on the criticism and better himself. You see that specifically and you think “Here is someone who cares about what people have to say”. Even in debates, Obama stands there, and when you watch him, he doesn’t get lost or confused, or give wandering answers, or get pressured or rushed. He is calm, cool, and collected. And that’s something that translate into being the sort of leader a country wants.

Obama is more successful than other candidates because he connects with his audience. Granted, people who are listening to him are generally already fans, or interested in what he will say. But for the most part, he is able to form a strong connection with these people from the podium. He’s very smart in the way he actually builds this connection up though. All the above gets you listening and believing in him, but he makes you his ‘friends’ by throwing in anecdotes and jokes and ‘fun’ things. Every time Obama is up and speaking, watch and wait – invariably he will tell a story that is uplifting, or a joke that makes you laugh, or do something personal that will get ‘familiarity’ resonating in the audience. This is a very successful technique – President Bush managed to beat Gore in mid-Western and Southern swing states because, as polling data showed, people said they people like they could sit down with Bush and “have a beer with him.” Bush had become a ‘friend’ of the voters. Obama is well on the way to doing that too.

And in finishing a speech, Obama is, again, different to his competitors. He ends on a tone of hope, just like he carries it through. He doesn’t end on a note of fear (like McCain often does) or threat (like Clinton does – saying to vote for her or you’ll suffer). He ends on an uplifting statement. An example:

I also ask you to remember that in this country, our history of overcoming the seemingly impossible always comes about because individuals who care really can make a difference. America is great because Americans are good.

And if this is what’s ringing in your ears as you leave, you’ll be more likely to go out and do something. Volunteer, drum up support, vote. If Obama ends with you inspired to do something – and that something is to help him – you’re more likely to do it than if you’re afraid to do anything at all.

On a basic language use level, his speeches have some classic trademarks. Anaphora – repeating same words and expressions at the beginning of successive sentences. Martin Luther King Jr. did it with “I have a dream”. Epistrophe, and the repeating of a word or phrase at the end of a sentence, also comes into play; most commonly with “Yes we can!” It’s another of his campaign slogans, and it’s something that the audience has come to yell out on their own. It brings a new level of participation to his speeches – a level that his opponents don’t have. A great example is in his concession speech from New Hampshire:

It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation: Yes, we can. It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail towards freedom through the darkest of nights: Yes, we can. It was sung by immigrants as they struck out for distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness: Yes, we can.

By the end of that speech, as I mentioned, everyone forgot that he was the loser. The crowds there, and the audiences around the world watching were so motivated and revved up and inspired by the speech, and by just this close, that his polling numbers blew through the roof.

His pacing, and pauses, are perfect every time he has something to say. After rallying everyone to a cheer, he will wait long enough to let it die down, then a little longer to let everyone calm down, and then a little longer so that you know what he has to say now is serious. That’s when he brings out a story of the battle for hope, a story he heard ‘on the trail’, and how this person, or that story, is driving him further. He’ll tell the story slower, and more spaced out, than if he were on policy, and a different speed again he speaks of hope and change. And after this, after his personal tale, he will work the crowd up again to a cheer by adjusting his own volume. He gets louder so that the audience gets louder. And then he gets louder again, and the cheering follows in volume.

So I made the claim in the opening of this post that Obama’s speaking style is perfect. I hope I made a good case for it. When I see him, I’m inspired, as are millions of others. His policies have no immediate effect on me, and I have no part in the U.S. political system. So what about him appeals to me? The way he speaks.

Thomas.

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Obama’s speaking style

  1. Mario Cuomo is a great speaker too but he was what I consider a poor NY Governor.

    He was very good at articulating what were the problems but poor at arriving at the answers as to how to solve them.

    I believe that Obama arrives at valid conclusions as to how to solve the problems. As someone with the worldwide credibility for having opposed the war and willingness to even talk to our enemies without preconditions I think that he will break the present impasse.

    Hillary would need to put a lot of lipstick on that pig she voted for.

  2. You’re spot on there – Mario Cuomo is one heck of a speaker. I would dare to say that without him giving his speech at the 1992 DNC, Bill Clinton would have struggled in the election that followed. It was rousing and motivated the party and its supporters like they needed to be in order to defeat the incumbent president.

    And let’s not forget the 1984 keynote address that he gave – it was the only thing notable to come from the Democrats that year (and, yes, more impressive than the candidates). It was a shame that he never grabbed the bull by the horns and ran for top spot in the country. I can’t understand why he still didn’t run in 1992 even with incumbent and favourite Bush in office.

    Yes, Obama does have solutions. But most (creditable) politicians have some sort of solutions. I think Obama stands head and shoulders above the rest because he can get people to believe in his solutions, instead of convincing people like others.

    It goes without saying Obama’s position on the Iraq war is a great benefit to him come the election. There is no way that Hillary could have prettied her position at all. She’d get hammered for any attempt, and even with a dissatisfied country, they would see McCain as a more ‘reliable’ option.

  3. I am amazed. By what measure is Obama a great speaker? His everyday speech is peppered with ‘ums’ and ‘you knows’ and hesitations. He admits frequently to being “clumsy” in his choice of his words and then he needs to restate his position and clarify and clarify. When I listen to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., whose oratory was indeed perfectly executed, nevermind the beauty of his message, I cannot find a comparison to the halting speech of Obama. Senator Clinton is a far better speaker, even though I would not consider her a great orator.

  4. I’d like Obama to win, but after reading those snippets from this post, I feel rhetoriced to death. If you want a good speech, try Keating on the Unknown Soldier. They put it on the HSC.

  5. huntindonpost.

    With all due respect, maybe the ums and you knows are the only thing you want to understand in Obama’s speeches.

    If you google… obama oct 2002 iraq ….and objectively read his speech you will see that he has identified the relavant factors, given them their proper priorities and arrived at the correct conclusion using information that was available to everyone.

    rabbit

    I see content in Obama’s speeches not just pretty words.

    citizenwells

    Omama and Hitler were both superb orators. So your reasoning isas follows:

    A is B

    C is B

    therefore A is C which is a fallocy know as “affirming the consequent”

    that is like saying

    White is a color
    Black is a color
    therefore white is black

  6. Go to my blog and read the post(s) regarding the Obama campaign
    and Nazi Germany.
    By the way, I started out as a math major and was in computer
    software and business systems over 30 years.
    Logic is a specialty of mine.

  7. Go to my blog and read the post(s) regarding the Obama campaign
    and Nazi Germany.
    By the way, I started out as a math major and was in computer
    software and business systems over 30 years.
    Logic is a specialty of mine.

  8. Gasdocpol, I have looked for meaning in Obama’s speeches. He almost never says anything and the one time I thought he did it turned out the governor of Massachusetts said it. He actually is eloquent. The speech on race had substance. I will give him that. It is the one time I heard him take a stand. I agreed with some of it, didn’t agree with some of it, but he spoke well and the speech was on the whole very good. When I see him speak on television without a script, when he speaks in a debate, and when he speaks at a rally he is rather bad. In the first two situations, he fumbles his answers. In the latter he says platitudes that are completely vapid. They mean absolutely nothing.

    I am with Citizenwells on one thing: Hitler had substance. It was horrendous, but it wasn’t all vapid. It was evil. I don’t think Obama is evil or Hitlerian, though I am getting concerned about certain totalitarian-style elements in his rhetoric. He is starting to buy this messiah-stuff being said about him, in my opinion. As always, we can respectfully disagree.

  9. I would have thought an American might think of Billy Graham, and I attended his meetings in 1959 — he was spellbinding. Or you might think of F D Roosevelt, some of whose speeches may be seen is a doco called “Brother, Can You Spare a Dime”; I was quite amazed by his powers as a speaker, to judge from them. Or Martin Luther King. In fact, there have been many great US orators. Hitler ranted.

  10. Pingback: A handy reference « Deus Lo Vult

  11. huntingdonpost

    Does anything in the following except from a speech by Obama in Oct 2002 have any meaning for you?

    I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

    I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

    I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

  12. Wow – what an excellent article and very accurate observations. Very interesting that you should have written this article more than six months ago and yet, the victory speech was precisely as you described.

  13. i must apprciate first Obama’s brave fight, and shud urge him to keep the ball rolling, that was a great change he brought, and being the 1st black youth american president i very much the gud lord will carry him thru thick and thin.

  14. I am little disappointed in our President. It appears that his speeches are always accompanied by teleprompters. Without them, it is…..um, um, um…..a hundred times….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s